<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<rss version="2.0">
<channel>
<title><![CDATA[ Spectrecom Blog Entries - Ben ]]></title>
<link>http://www.spectrecom.co.uk/newsblog/1/author/27</link>
<description><![CDATA[ Spectrecom Blog Entries - Ben ]]></description>
<lastBuildDate>Thu, 02 Sep 2010 21:10:01 GMT</lastBuildDate>
<language>en-gb</language>
</channel>
</rss>://www.spectrecom.co.uk/newsblog/entry/217</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 24 Aug 2010 12:59:43 GMT</pubDate>
<title><![CDATA[ Video Production – 5 Top Tips for Final Cut Pro Editors ]]></title>
<link>http://www.spectrecom.co.uk/newsblog/entry/217</link>
<description><![CDATA[ <p>  
<meta name="Title" />
<meta name="Keywords" />
<meta content="text/html; charset=utf-8" http-equiv="Content-Type" />
<meta content="Word.Document" name="ProgId" />
<meta content="Microsoft Word 2008" name="Generator" />
<meta content="Microsoft Word 2008" name="Originator" />
<link href="file://localhost/Users/ChristiaanJCHarden/Library/Caches/TemporaryItems/msoclip/0/clip_filelist.xml" rel="File-List" /> 
<style></style>    
<p>Video production techniques are constantly evolving and I'm positive that a majority of Final Cut Pro editors haven't even picked up the selection of manuals shipped with the software. And even if they have, there's a big difference between being able to operate a piece of editing software, and being a good editor. As such, I've come up with a few video production tips that I hope will aid your filmmaking, and be useful across every type of project that you're editing. </p>   
<p><strong>Digital Cinema Preview</strong></p>   
<p>Especially when you don't have a second (or third) display for playback, this is a really useful feature for watching back videos in full screen. First make sure to go to VIEW, then EXTERNAL FRAMES and click on ALL FRAMES. You might find that this is ticked already, but worth checking anyway as it's key to making this work. </p>   
<p>Following this, whilst still in the VIEW drop-down menu, click on VIDEO PLAYBACK and select DIGITAL CINEMA DESKTOP PREVIEW – MAIN. Your canvas will then fill the entire space of the monitor, allowing you to watch your work back in all its glory. This is also a great thing to do before delivery/completing any piece of work, because it's very easy to miss things in the canvas that become apparent once you blow it up to full screen.</p>     
<p><strong>Using Dissolves and Transitions Effectively</strong></p>   
<p>Just because you have a large amount of transitions to throw into the mix, doesn't mean you should. The best editors allow the transitions to seamlessly move the edit along without distraction, and at the points where you do see one, it's been put there for a good reason. </p>   
<p>Noise Industries (FX Factory) do a great mix of funky transitions and effects in their plugins, but you would really only want to use these sparingly and with purpose. The last thing you want to do is pull the audience out of the experience by 'twirl' wiping the screen, or by throwing in paint splashes that do nothing but distract.</p>   
<p>There's a good reason that simple dissolves are still so popular (and my most used transition), especially when it comes to showing a movement of time/setting in my edited piece. Whether it's a film, a corporate video or a music video, as an editor it's important to always be thinking about the purpose and target audience of the film, and reflect that in your work; in most cases, less is more!</p>     
<p><strong>Camera Moves &amp; Static Shots<br />
</strong></p>   
<p>A really simple trick this... It's similar to the Ken Burns effect, and will help to add steady movement to a shot, that can be impossible for a cameraman to get without the right equipment. </p>   
<p>To dolly forward/push/zoom a shot, firstly load your clip up into the VIEWER; a good example to test with might be a wide shot of a building or a room. In the MOTION tab, under BASIC MOTION, add a keyframe (by clicking on the diamond) next to SCALE. Then within the window, move to the end of the same clip and add another keyframe. Set the scale (which by default is at 100 to most clips) to 105 or 110 (depending on the length of the clip). </p>   
<p>If done right, your shot will slowly move forwards. You can also reverse this by putting in the numbers the opposite way around, so that the shot 'pulls back' instead. A useful little trick for any form of video production, I'm sure you'll agree!</p>     
<p><strong>Make a Freeze Frame Still Image, and Export (optional)</strong></p>   
<p>In Post-Production, chances are you'll be asked to pull still images out either to use in your edit, or to export for a client. It's really quite simple, and there's a couple of ways to do it.</p>   
<p>The first way is through Final Cut Pro of course, and this is particularly great if you want to freeze frame a shot. The first thing to do is position your playhead at the frame you would like to turn into a still; this can be done in any of the Viewer, Canvas, or Timeline. Then go to MODIFY, and then select <strong>MAKE FREEZE FRAME.</strong></p>   
<p>Your freeze frame will show up in the viewer window with a default duration of 10 seconds (unless you've set it otherwise). You can adjust the in and out point here, to the duration you want. For speed I typically drag the clip straight into my TIMELINE and trim from there. </p>   
<p>With the same clip selected, you can also choose EXPORT, then USING QUICKTIME CONVERSION, and choose STILL IMAGE from the Format drop-down. This will save a still image to your computer as a JPEG for example) to use outside of FCP.</p>   
<p>The second way, is more for those who want a still that they can use outside of the edit specifically. So for example when your client wants a few stills from their finished video. In that case I recommend purchasing DV Kitchen, which amongst other things&nbsp; has a Timefreezer option where you can save a high quality still image to your hard drive, at your desired frame size. There's also a quality slider, which you can alter as per your ouput requirements.</p>     
<p><strong>Batch Export</strong></p>   
<p>A final handy tip, when you have lots of sequences/videos to export, and don't want to have to do it individually. </p>   
<p>Highlight all the clips/sequences you need to export in your BROWSER, then right click (or CTRL+click) and choose BATCH EXPORT. Your videos will load into another window, at which point you'll want to select SETTINGS (at the foot of the window) and set the format, codec, aspect ratio as required. Once done, click EXPORT and you're away. </p>   
<p>Worth noting that if you are exporting sequences marked with in and out points, you'll need to tick that option in the Batch Export settings.</p>&nbsp;I hope that you've found these Final Cut Pro tips useful. <br />
</p> ]]></description>
</item>
<item>
<guid>http://www.spectrecom.co.uk/newsblog/entry/102</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 09 Nov 2009 12:00:22 GMT</pubDate>
<title><![CDATA[ A late Halloween Treat ]]></title>
<link>http://www.spectrecom.co.uk/newsblog/entry/102</link>
<description><![CDATA[ <p>With a large Halloween party arranged at our parents for the weekend, everybody was doing their bit to ensure that it went down a storm. It seemed only right that Jonny and I also chip in our with our contribution, which is why we decided to make this short film. Though we were actually filming for a different project in the area at the time, as the weekend came we saw a good opportunity to rope in some of our family members to be filmed for this horror film idea.</p>
<p>We formulated the story, and shot and edited it all within the space of about 10 hours, and we're really pleased with the results. It intentionally homages some well known films, and definitely had the right effect on the night, helping to scare all the visitors to the party. Following the film, all party goers were taken on a scary tour of our parents woodland, where they got to meet the aforementioned serial killer from the film who was still stalking the woods! The whole thing went down so well I expect we'll be doing it again, so keep an eye out for the sequel, which will be bigger, darker and more expensive - because that's the rule for sequels, right?</p>
<p>Enjoy with the lights turned off, and the sound turned up!
<object width="660" height="405">
<param value="http://www.youtube.com/v/t1zGZI2WjXM&amp;hl=en&amp;fs=1&amp;color1=0x2b405b&amp;color2=0x6b8ab6&amp;hd=1&amp;border=1" name="movie" />
<param value="true" name="allowFullScreen" />
<param value="always" name="allowscriptaccess" />
<embed width="660" height="405" allowfullscreen="true" allowscriptaccess="always" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" src="http://www.youtube.com/v/t1zGZI2WjXM&amp;hl=en&amp;fs=1&amp;color1=0x2b405b&amp;color2=0x6b8ab6&amp;hd=1&amp;border=1"></embed></object></p> ]]></description>
</item>
<item>
<guid>http://www.spectrecom.co.uk/newsblog/entry/90</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 15 Oct 2009 11:55:37 GMT</pubDate>
<title><![CDATA[ Streamtime Is Go! ]]></title>
<link>http://www.spectrecom.co.uk/newsblog/entry/90</link>
<description><![CDATA[ <p>Over the past few years Spectrecom has expanded rapidly, resulting in a much greater need to ensure customers and projects are managed effectively. So, in early 2009, we set about looking for a solution to our needs, which could give us networked information internally, as well as allowing remote login for those staff members who are often out and about. This whole process took much longer than we anticipated, and many different trials were installed and tested over the summer months. <br />
<br />
 The biggest issue was that because we wanted nearly our entire operations to be made available under this piece of software, (including tasks, calendars, invoices, quotes, etc) we found that many different packages were just totally unsuitable, particularly for a video production company. It wasn't until we landed on Streamtime that our needs were seemingly met. I'm happy to say that we're now up and running, having just installed the server in the past week. Even our iPhones are operating with the software!<br />
<br />
 Suffice to say, we're all very excited about this move, and once all of our staff are in the routine of using it on a daily basis, we're sure that operations will be running even smoother than they did before.&nbsp; <br />
</p> ]]></description>
</item>
<item>
<guid>http://www.spectrecom.co.uk/newsblog/entry/82</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 01 Oct 2009 14:32:26 GMT</pubDate>
<title><![CDATA[ Upgrade or not? ]]></title>
<link>http://www.spectrecom.co.uk/newsblog/entry/82</link>
<description><![CDATA[ <p>As a video production company, we find that staying on the forefront in the development of digital cinema is often necessary. That said it's easy to be wowed by new technology when what you currently have is perfectly fine. In Post-Production our work is nearly always software based, and with every application comes a regular (and sometimes expensive) update. <br />
<br />
The most recent version of <a href="http://www.apple.com/finalcutstudio/" target="_blank">Final Cut Studio </a>(3) was released by Apple with barely a whisper, bringing with it a wealth of improvements in an already brilliant editing package. However it's clear from the offset that an overhaul hasn't happened, and that the software is in a situation where it's on a constant course of improvement and streamlining, rather than just simply adding more and more onto it. I've had a chance to test the new version, and have been impressed with what I've seen. However, because this isn't deemed (by me, at least) as a major upgrade, the question is whether it's worth spending your hard earned cash on it or not, assuming you are running Final Cut Studio 2.<br />
<br />
First omission to note is Livetype, which was clearly surplus to requirements with the improvements in Motion, which itself nears ever closer to After Effects in terms of power, . As well as the upgrades to Motion, Soundtrack 3 adds many more features including better audio fixing tools. These two pieces of software, alongside Final Cut Pro, have seen the biggest amount of improvements, and should keep editors busy for a long time.<br />
<br />
Again DVD Studio Pro is left in the shadows, maintaining it's version 4 status and again ignoring Blu-ray. It's in need of some better integration and even a new interface, but I guess that might be left to the next upgrade. At the very least if Apple start integrating Blu-ray into their machines (and it has been rumoured), then an online software update might fix that side of things. Still it's a suprising move on Apple's part, as they concentrate more on the online aspect of video.<br />
<br />
Compressor 3.5 has been tweaked to include some much needed features (including the 'Share' export setting), whilst integrating an online distribution encoder that fires your files onto YouTube. I'm still of the opinion that better out of the box options like WMV and Flash are a necessity, saving me from going out to other encoders like DV Kitchen. That said, Apple's compression package is better than ever and still one of the best available.<br />
<br />
Color has too seen a fair share of improvements, though still carries too much of the look of Final Touch still, and probably could do with a good clean-up of it's interface. It's still a great package though, and considering it's available at a fraction of the cost of what you might have bought it for alone, it's presence within the Studio package is always welcome.<br />
<br />
The fact that Final Cut Studio 3 doesn't support Power PC's (out of the box) is a concern considering one of our most used edit stations is a G5. As that can be worked around somewhat, the other key factor that makes upgrading an attractive prospect is the way it operates on newer machines. Render times have been<br />
<br />
Apple doesn't actually upgrade that often, in comparison to Adobe, so at least you know you won't be buying a new version in 12-16 months. But should you upgrade now? At Spectrecom we're still running Final Cut Studio 2, and an upgrade is inevitable. The cost factor for every upgrade is always off putting, though the pricing is fair considering the amount of applications that the Studio package offers under one roof. Cross compatibility with older/newer versions of Final Cut has always been an issue, so upgrading across the board is the only way to do it, meaning that once one of the main editing machines is upgraded, the rest have to follow suit immediately. <br />
<br />
Apple supply an awful lot of <a href="http://images.apple.com/finalcutstudio/docs/Final_Cut_Studio-In_depth.pdf" target="_blank">literature</a> through their website, so weighing up the pro's and con's is easy. Based on what I've seen, I've recommended that we make plans to do it, and action it across the board when there is a gap in the schedule to do so. Although this won't affect the quality of our work at all, it will at least give us editors new toys to play with!&nbsp; <br />
</p> ]]></description>
</item>
<item>
<guid>http://www.spectrecom.co.uk/newsblog/entry/73</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 03 Jul 2009 16:04:51 GMT</pubDate>
<title><![CDATA[ Last Day at Spectrecom ]]></title>
<link>http://www.spectrecom.co.uk/newsblog/entry/73</link>
<description><![CDATA[ <p>Last day working at Spectrecom and consequently my last blog entry here on the website.&nbsp; As I look back, I realise I was so busy running things on the back-end with it, that I didn't have a huge amount of time to contribute to the front-facing blog!</p>
<p>Working for Spectrecom has been a truly wonderful experience.&nbsp; We've seen huge successes in a time of economic woe and with a fun working environment, brilliant colleagues and an exciting field of emerging business, I could hardly have asked for a better place to work since April 2008.&nbsp; The usual mentions of having grown in many ways here must not go unsaid, and I will always treasure the opportunities provided for me here.</p>
<p>So, a big hello and goodbye to all of our clients, affiliate partners, freelancers, suppliers and networking buddies who have all contributed to Spectrecom's most successful year of trading so far.&nbsp; I will truly miss my associations here and wish the ever-growing team continued success in all their endeavours.</p>
<p>I'll be moving on to explore a number of freelance and consulting positions. You can find me easily on <a target="_blank" title="Matthew Carrozo's Profile on LinkedIn" href="http://www.linkedin.com/in/carrozo">LinkedIn</a> if you want to keep up with progress on that front.</p>
<p>So long, and thanks for all the fish.</p>
<p>Cheers,</p>
<p>Matt<br />
<a href="mailto:matthewcarrozo@hotmail.com?subject=Re:%20Last%20day%20at%20Spectrecom">matthewcarrozo@hotmail.com</a><br />
</p> ]]></description>
</item>
<item>
<guid>http://www.spectrecom.co.uk/newsblog/entry/72</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 24 Jun 2009 10:21:34 GMT</pubDate>
<title><![CDATA[  Executives Turn to Web Video for Business Information ]]></title>
<link>http://www.spectrecom.co.uk/newsblog/entry/72</link>
<description><![CDATA[ <p><a target="_blank" title="ReelSEO - Web Video Marketing Experts" href="http://www.reelseo.com/online-video-executives/11021/">ReelSEO</a> recently posted an item about a new study - &quot;<a target="_blank" title="Executives Prefer Video" href="http://www.forbes.com/forbesinsights">The Rise of the Digital C-Suite: How Executives Locate and Filter Business Information</a>.&quot;</p>
<p>What's interesting to us is that almost a quarter (24%) of executives indicated a preference for retrieving business information via video.</p>
<p>Whilst Business to Consumer video marketing has been growing in line with the explosive growth of YouTube and the iPlayer, B2B - corporate - video has been going for a lot longer.&nbsp; </p>
<p>But such a strong preference amongst executives for video content also means that corporate video has come a long way from <a target="_blank" title="Awesomely Bad Corporate Video from Russia" href="http://www.wired.com/dangerroom/2009/06/awesomely-bad-corporate-video-lets-drink-to-the-russian-gas/">something like this</a>.&nbsp; Really.</p> ]]></description>
</item>
<item>
<guid>http://www.spectrecom.co.uk/newsblog/entry/70</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 01 Jun 2009 17:07:48 GMT</pubDate>
<title><![CDATA[ 80% of Recession Shoppers Want Companies With a Human Face ]]></title>
<link>http://www.spectrecom.co.uk/newsblog/entry/70</link>
<description><![CDATA[ <p>A <a target="_blank" title="80% of Recession Shoppers Want Companies With a Human Face" href="http://www.marketingcharts.com/interactive/80-of-recession-shoppers-want-companies-with-%E2%80%98human-face%E2%80%99-9195/?utm_campaign=newsletter&amp;utm_source=mc&amp;utm_medium=textlink">story over at marketingcharts.com</a> reports today that &quot;80% of consumers want companies to show a human face.&quot;</p>
<p>You can guess why we think that's important!&nbsp; Most of our work expressly aims to put a human face to companies and organisations, because that's who consumers, clients and members will be working with.</p>
<p>The research also points to consumers increasingly putting internet research and opinion sharing online at the top of their agenda - nearly as many (78%) feel that this is a very important part of the shopping experience - even when purchases are not made online.</p>
<p>Food for thought when considering using video on your site and beyond!</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p> ]]></description>
</item>
<item>
<guid>http://www.spectrecom.co.uk/newsblog/entry/69</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 21 May 2009 08:33:01 GMT</pubDate>
<title><![CDATA[ A Day of Video Uploaded to YouTube every minute! ]]></title>
<link>http://www.spectrecom.co.uk/newsblog/entry/69</link>
<description><![CDATA[ <p>A story buzzing around the interwebs this morning is from the YouTube blog, who <a href="http://www.youtube.com/blog?entry=on4EmafA5MA" title="YouTube blog" target="_blank">report</a> that a staggering 20 hours of video is uploaded to the site <span style="font-style: italic">every minute</span>.</p>
<p>That means in the last 24 hours, <span style="font-weight: bold">over</span> <span style="font-weight: bold">3 years </span>of video footage was posted.</p>
<p>Computer says yes.</p> ]]></description>
</item>
<item>
<guid>http://www.spectrecom.co.uk/newsblog/entry/68</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 19 May 2009 16:48:59 GMT</pubDate>
<title><![CDATA[ Viral Video Aims for Modern Art Skeptics ]]></title>
<link>http://www.spectrecom.co.uk/newsblog/entry/68</link>
<description><![CDATA[ <p>The Museum of Modern Art in New York City has commissioned a video targeted at people who might scoff at contemporary art. <br />
</p>
<object width="425" height="344">
<param value="http://www.youtube.com/v/IpMuHDJRQfc&amp;hl=en&amp;fs=1" name="movie" />
<param value="true" name="allowFullScreen" />
<param value="always" name="allowscriptaccess" />
<embed width="425" height="344" allowfullscreen="true" allowscriptaccess="always" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" src="http://www.youtube.com/v/IpMuHDJRQfc&amp;hl=en&amp;fs=1"></embed></object>
<p>Read more from the Wall Street Journal <a target="_blank" title="MoMa Viral Video Aims for Modern Art Skeptics" href="http://blogs.wsj.com/digits/2009/05/15/momas-viral-video-aims-for-modern-art-skeptics/">here</a>.</p>
<p> </p> ]]></description>
</item>
<item>
<guid>http://www.spectrecom.co.uk/newsblog/entry/67</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 18 May 2009 16:13:05 GMT</pubDate>
<title><![CDATA[ Web Video Production Radically Alters Online Behaviour ]]></title>
<link>http://www.spectrecom.co.uk/newsblog/entry/67</link>
<description><![CDATA[ <p>Afternoon, folks.&nbsp; A little post today about a report Nielsen put out recently detailing how the growing popularity of video production and social networking is driving and deepening user engagement with the internet, causing a dramatic shift for consumers and advertisers.</p>
<p>In the report, we learn that:</p>
<ul>
<li>the unique audience for online video production surpassed that of email in November 2007.</li>
<li>usage of online video destinations has risen by a staggering 339% since 2003.</li>
<li>time spent on these sites has exploded by almost 2,000% in the same time frame.</li>
<li>in the past year unique viewers grew by 10%, number of individual streams by 41%, length of these steams grew by 71%.</li></ul>More of the report can be found <a href="http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/wp-content/uploads/2009/04/nielsen-online-global-lanscapefinal1.pdf" title="Nielsen Online Global Landscape PDF" target="_blank">here</a>.<br />
      
<p><br />
      &nbsp;</p> ]]></description>
</item>
<item>
<guid>http://www.spectrecom.co.uk/newsblog/entry/66</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 15 May 2009 08:33:08 GMT</pubDate>
<title><![CDATA[ Video Production Tips For Beginners - Editing - Part 3 ]]></title>
<link>http://www.spectrecom.co.uk/newsblog/entry/66</link>
<description><![CDATA[ <p><span style="font-weight: bold; font-style: italic"><a href="/newsblog/entry/65/video-production-tips-for-beginners-editing-part-2" target="_blank">Continued from part 2...</a></span><span style="font-weight: bold; text-decoration: underline"><a href="/newsblog/entry/65/video-production-tips-for-beginners-editing-part-2" target="_blank"></a><br />
<br />
   5) A non-certified Training Course</span><br />
   Steve Milton, a Director at Spectrecom, recently attended a day course ran by Final Cut supremo <a target="_blank" href="http://www.larryjordan.biz/">Larry Jordan</a>. As well as being incredibly accessible due to the Larry's great presenting style, it was incredibly informative, and offered many invaluable tips that might usually be ignore by other training courses. Though he doesn't visit the UK often enough (Larry is based in the USA), it's worth signing up for his newsletter and monitoring his course dates to see if he's going to be close-by to you. The cost of his courses vary, and will sometimes be subsidised, so it's worth weighing that up alongside other options given here to see what will be most cost effective and useful for you.<br />
<br />
   Equally if you know any Final Cut Pro editors, see if they can give you an introductory lesson for free. There's no harm in asking, and if you have anything you can offer return, like camera or graphics tuition, see if you can work out a good deal between you where you both can benefit.<br />
<br />
<span style="font-weight: bold; text-decoration: underline">6) Pick up a book</span><br />
   A quick search on <a target="_blank" href="http://www.amazon.co.uk">Amazon</a> will bring up a big list of books for various levels and incarnations of Final Cut. The Apple Pro Training Series are recommended, though there are several other book series that should be looked at. Be sure to check you're buying the right book for the software version you are using, e.g. Final Cut Pro 4, 5, 6, Final Cut Express, Final Cut HD.<br />
<br />
   If you buy the Final Cut Studio suite, the books that are supplied are incredibly in-depth, and if you have the patience you'll learn the software slowly but surely. I personally found this to be a good way of learning initially, but the art of editing is something else entirely. That said, many of these options given will only teach you how to use the software, and not necessarily the best way to cut effectively. There are books that can teach you this however, which do usually have CDs/DVDs supplied that will give you the opportunity to cut different types of video, like dramatic scenes for example.<br />
<br />
<span style="font-weight: bold; text-decoration: underline">7) Teach yourself!</span><br />
   If you've got any experience whatsoever in video editing, then you might find that moving onto Final Cut (in any form) is an easy transition (no pun intended). The taskbar selection and the tool names might be different, but video editing is nearly always the same no matter which piece of software you use. All Final Cut Pro does is offer a much large suite of applications and tools for the professional filmmaker. So boot up Final Cut Pro, load up your footage and have a go at editing something together. Learning to edit isn't an incredibly taxing job, and can be hugely rewarding. It's making use of those skills to good effect, combined with plenty of practise, that will make you stand out in the crowd.<br />
<br />
<span style="font-weight: bold">Good luck!!</span><span style="font-weight: bold; font-style: italic"><br />
<br />
<br />
<a target="_blank" href="/newsblog/entry/64/video-production-tips-for-beginners-editing-part-1">Read part 1 here.</a><br />
<a target="_blank" href="/newsblog/entry/65/video-production-tips-for-beginners-editing-part-2">Read part 2 here.</a></span></p> ]]></description>
</item>
<item>
<guid>http://www.spectrecom.co.uk/newsblog/entry/65</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 14 May 2009 09:31:39 GMT</pubDate>
<title><![CDATA[ Video Production Tips For Beginners - Editing - Part 2 ]]></title>
<link>http://www.spectrecom.co.uk/newsblog/entry/65</link>
<description><![CDATA[ <p><a href="/newsblog/entry/64/video-production-tips-for-beginners-editing-part-1" target="_blank"><span style="font-weight: bold; font-style: italic">Continued from part 1...</span></a><span style="font-weight: bold; text-decoration: underline"> </span></p>
<p><span style="font-weight: bold; text-decoration: underline">&nbsp;3) Websites and Forums</span><br />
   Even if you're a confident user in Final Cut Pro, you might occasionally find yourself stuck with a problem that just won't go away; it might even be as simple as wanting to know what the easiest way is to perform a particular task. One way to get a quick answer is to visit a popular forum, where users are more than willing to share their knowledge with you. <a target="_blank" href="http://www.creativecow.net/">Creative Cow</a> is a great place to start, as well as <a target="_blank" href="http://discussions.apple.com/index.jspa">Apple's own discussion threads</a>.<br />
<br />
   Further to that there are many other post production news sites/blogs that have regular videos, in various areas, that can be accessed for free. <a target="_blank" href="http://www.dvcreators.net/">DVCreators.net</a> and <a target="_blank" href="http://provideocoalition.com/">Provideocoalition.com</a> are worth visiting, and can direct you in the way of many other communities who are willing to share their tips and advice with you.</p>
<p>Finally it's worth glancing over a few of the beginners videos on <a target="_blank" href="http://www.apple.com/finalcutstudio/">Apple's main site</a>, which include some great case studies on the software in action within the industry.<br />
<br />
<span style="font-weight: bold; text-decoration: underline">4) A Certified Training Course</span><br />
   I can't vouch for this method of training, and my one experience with the company mentioned below was not a good one, but it does work for many people and gives you a qualification at the end of it. As such, it's a much more expensive way of learning, and might only be considered by professionals. London based <a target="_blank" href="http://www.sohoeditors.com/">Soho Editors</a> offer courses such as these, though you should be able to find a number of companies offering these Apple certified courses in a number of places. It should certainly fastrack you towards knowing the ins and outs of the software, but many people will be turned off by the price if they are wanting to edit more as a hobby rather than a career.&nbsp;</p>
<p><span style="font-weight: bold; font-style: italic">&nbsp;<br />
 Continued tomorrow...</span></p>
<p><a href="newsblog/entry/64/video-production-tips-for-beginners-editing-part-1">Read part 1 here.</a> </p> ]]></description>
</item>
<item>
<guid>http://www.spectrecom.co.uk/newsblog/entry/64</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 13 May 2009 16:30:08 GMT</pubDate>
<title><![CDATA[ Video Production Tips For Beginners - Editing - Part 1 ]]></title>
<link>http://www.spectrecom.co.uk/newsblog/entry/64</link>
<description><![CDATA[ <p>With standard and high definition camcorders becoming so affordable that there's really no excuse not to have one. And even if you don't, many digital cameras (and SLR's), as well as mobile phones, record video footage with varying results. However it's not often considered at any point during the buying process, as to how the user will work with the end results. <br />
<br />
     Many people on daily find themselves shooting excessive amounts of footage taken from family gatherings, parties, weddings and even their own attempts at short films and artistic pieces. A brand new video production company will know that startup costs need to be kept a minimum, and the post production setup can cost a fair whack if not carefully considered. For the professional too, there's many good reasons for reviewing your post production setup and wondering where it can not only be simplified, but be more cost effective. That's where Final Cut Express and Final Cut Studio 2 come into play*.<br />
<br />
     The affordable <a target="_blank" href="http://www.apple.com/uk/finalcutexpress/">F</a><a title="" target="_blank" href="http://www.apple.com/uk/finalcutexpress/">inal Cut Express</a> is aimed squarely at the amateur filmmaker, and is essentially a trimmed down version of its big brother, Final Cut Pro. Final Cut Pro itself comes in a package alongside other software that comfortably complements it, giving the user a whole suite of post production facilities; collectively it's called <a target="_blank" href="http://www.apple.com/uk/finalcutstudio/">Final Cut Studio</a>**. Both Express and Pro are relatively easy to learn, with the difficulty only ramping up when the user begins to ask more complicated questions of the applications. The Apple hardware that runs these software's can vary in price, but even in a scenario where you're purchasing a (very high end) £7,000 Apple edit suite, you're buying into the same hardware and software that is being used in Hollywood at this very moment. Editing is no longer only for the professional and well-off, it's accessible to all.<br />
<br />
     I often get asked whether I can give lessons in editing, chiefly in Final Cut Pro 6, and although I'm more than happy to do that, my time generally costs money and it's not always feasible that the average person has money to outlay on training once they've spent money on the hardware and software required. Though most forms of training will require some kind of monetary outlay, it doesn't need to cost you the earth. So I've come up with <span style="font-weight: bold">7 tips</span> on how to best learn Final Cut software as a beginner, which I hope you find useful:<br />
<br />
     *It is worth noting that both software's discussed here are for Apple Mac only, though there are great options for PC users too, including Adobe Premiere (Pro).<br />
     **The latest version at time of writing is<span style="font-style: italic"> Final Cut Studio 2</span> (with Final Cut Pro 6).<br />
<br />
<span style="font-weight: bold; text-decoration: underline">1) Structured Online/DVD Tutorials</span><br />
     I've used both Lynda.com and Total Training on previous occasions, and have found them both to be incredibly useful. <a target="_blank" href="http://www.lynda.com">Lynda.com</a> offers great value, giving the user a huge database of video tutorials for a low fee. A massive list of applications are covered, and there are several levels for the user to go in at, with lessons being set so it's easy to drop in and out during your learning process. Though <a target="_blank" href="http://www.totaltraining.com/">Total Training</a> are getting a little behind on their Apple Post Production DVDs, they are still very good in general and are good value for money. Further to this, <a target="_blank" href="http://www.pixelcorps.tv/macbreak">Macbreak</a> offer a regular podcast, which more often than not gives the user great tips on how to get the most out of Apple's post production software. I've found myself not only learning new ways to edit and use the applications I have on hand, but also aiding my own progression through software that is brand new to me, like Apple Motion and Color. Highly recommended.<br />
<br />
<span style="font-weight: bold; text-decoration: underline">2) Video Hosting Websites</span><br />
<a target="_blank" href="http://www.youtube.com">YouTube</a> is always worth checking out, no matter what level you're at. Even though it's less structured you're more than likely to find a video that will teach you exactly what you want to know. In fact, I'm confident you could learn Final Cut Pro from scratch if you had enough time and patience to wade through the videos available on there.&nbsp;&nbsp;</p>
<p><span style="font-style: italic; font-weight: bold"><br />
    Continued tomorrow...</span><br />
</p> ]]></description>
</item>
<item>
<guid>http://www.spectrecom.co.uk/newsblog/entry/57</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 30 Apr 2009 14:27:15 GMT</pubDate>
<title><![CDATA[ Electric car hits the road ]]></title>
<link>http://www.spectrecom.co.uk/newsblog/entry/57</link>
<description><![CDATA[ <p>Spectrecom had the opportunity to work with the <a href="http://www.eccplc.com" target="_blank">Electric Car Corporation</a> over the last two weeks, resulting in a 7 minute video which is being used today for a major launch of their new car, the Citroen C1 Ev'ie. As the company name suggests, ECC produces cars powered solely by electricity, which for the city driver is a fantastic opportunity to save money whilst helping the environment.<br />
<br />
    The video, presented by Dominic Valitis and shot in HD, will be appearing online soon on ECC's website. We'll also be hosting the video through our own Spectrecom Player, as well as adding it to our <a href="http://www.youtube.com/spectrecomfilms">YouTube channel</a>. <a href="/about-spectrecom/our-responsibility">CSR</a> is important to us at Spectrecom, as the video production industry is typically very wasteful with natural resources, so this type of product sits well with our commitment to the environment. <br />
<br />
    The car itself is earning a vast amount of media coverage, especially due to the recent £250 million electric car strategy set out by the Government. The electric C1 Ev'ie will cost £16,850, and can be fully charged for only 90p, giving the car a range of 70 miles.<br />
<br />
    You can find out more about the car and the services ECC offer at:<br />
<a href="http://www.eccplc.com">http://www.eccplc.com</a><br />
<br />
    For more information on the launch today, you can view articles <a href="http://news.google.com/news/story?hl=en&amp;client=safari&amp;rls=en-us&amp;q=electric+car+c1&amp;um=1&amp;ie=UTF-8&amp;ncl=dGtp7pWH4EzITtM&amp;ei=fq35Sf6TNd66jAeD-r2uAw&amp;sa=X&amp;oi=news_result&amp;ct=more-results&amp;cd=1&amp;resnum=1%20">here</a>.</p> ]]></description>
</item>
<item>
<guid>http://www.spectrecom.co.uk/newsblog/entry/54</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 09 Apr 2009 16:24:17 GMT</pubDate>
<title><![CDATA[ Updated Studio Vid ]]></title>
<link>http://www.spectrecom.co.uk/newsblog/entry/54</link>
<description><![CDATA[ <p>For anybody interested in our studio hire, you'll probably want to take a look out our updated <a href="/the-studio/studio-overview" target="_blank">Studio</a> video. Though a vast majority of the content is the same as the one that existed before on the website, we've given it a lick of paint as well as sprucing it up with some new filters and transitions. It certainly shows of our facilities, as well as the fantastic space we have on offer. Though our green screen is very popular, the video does demonstrate that the space can be used in any number of ways for a shoot. The video was edited with a combination of Apple Motion, Adobe After Effects and of course Final Cut Pro 6. After post-production the next stage was to convert it Flash and put it within the bespoke <a href="/video-for-all/video-by-type/online-video">Spectrecom player</a>.</p>
<p>Our intentions at Spectrecom over the coming months, is to fill out the website with as much video content as possible. We aim to have as many of our video productions available to view as possible, whilst producing very specific edits for the 'Budget', 'Sector' and 'Type' pages of our website. Of course, if any readers have any other suggestions on how we can improve our website please let us know.</p>
<p>&nbsp;<a href="mailto:ben@spectrecom.co.uk?subject=New%20Studio%20Video" title="New Studio Video">ben@spectrecom.co.uk </a><br />
</p> ]]></description>
</item>
<item>
<guid>http://www.spectrecom.co.uk/newsblog/entry/52</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 07 Apr 2009 08:19:07 GMT</pubDate>
<title><![CDATA[ Fox Fury at Wolverine Leak ]]></title>
<link>http://www.spectrecom.co.uk/newsblog/entry/52</link>
<description><![CDATA[ <p>The Internet is always a great place for April Fools jokes. As you awake from your slumber and hazily load up Internet Explorer it's easy to forget the day of the year and thus be <a target="_blank" href="http://aprilfoolsdayontheweb.com/">tricked by any number of pranks</a>. This year however I wasn't getting fooled, and was fully prepared for the onslaught of ridiculous (but often believable) stories that would feature over my daily reads. So when I saw 'Wolverine leaked online' on SlashFilm.com I instantly thought “yeah, yeah – very funny” and scrolled onto the next story. However on this occasion I definitely was the fool.<br />
<br />
   If you don't know already, <a target="_blank" href="http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0458525/">X-Men Origins: Wolverine</a> made its way onto the interwebs on that very day, barely a month before the film opens in cinemas. Torrent downloaders went crazy, and the film was available on all corners of the world in no time whatsoever. You could probably search for it on Google right now and find one of the well known commercial trackers serving a link for the film.<br />
<br />
   Understandably 20th Century Fox have gone haywire, and in an attempt at damage limitation have called in the FBI. Their biggest concern will be the impact that it might cause on the box office, though Paul Dergarabedian, a box office analyst for Hollywood.com, believes that downloaders may still want to see the film in its finished form in the cinemas: &quot;Fox wants to show off this film in its best possible light, and this takes away some of their ability to market the film effectively, but seeing it in its unfinished version may just whet the appetite for people to see it again on the big screen.”<br />
<br />
   Interestingly it seems that the film may have been in quite an incomplete form, with many unfinished scenes and missing sound effects and music. It's likely too that it was edited together before the recent pickups/reshoots, so what finally emerges on the big screen might be dramatically different from what is freely available now. Indeed this isn't the first time that a film has leaked online, with Hulk, Halloween (reboot), Hostel 2 and American Gangster all suffering from early internet arrivals. Hostel 2 in particular performed very poorly, and Director Eli Roth has always blamed downloaders for the films commercial failure.<br />
<br />
   Personally I'm amazed at the whole story, not least because I can't see how any filesharer can justify watching this film in it's unfinished form. Surely the point of a major movie like this is that it allows the viewer to escape the real world and enjoy the on-screen fantasy? I think much of it comes down to the 'cool' element of being able to see a pre-release film, where you can freely comment and boast about having seen it, whilst sticking it to the studios who make many millions from these productions. <br />
<br />
   Equally I can see that the viewers opinion on the film will always be tarnished due to having the secrets revealed on any number of effects sequences during the film. Yes we know the actors are flying around on wires, but the point is we don't want to see the wires. Right? Yes it's intriguing to see the film making process, but if you were really keen to see this film wouldn't you truly want to see it as Director Gavin Hood intended? <br />
<br />
   Lets hope Fox find and nail the person responsible for the leak, and that the film does bring in the money it deserves at the box office. In fact early reports are good, and expectations are now lifted a great deal as a result. So it might not all be bad, after all.<br />
<br />
   In other related news, an idiotic Fox News Columnist, Roger Friedman, downloaded and reviewed the film online. <a target="_blank" href="http://abcnews.go.com/Entertainment/Movies/story?id=7262112&amp;page=1">Thankfully it seems they have given him the boot</a>.<br />
   &nbsp;</p> ]]></description>
</item>
<item>
<guid>http://www.spectrecom.co.uk/newsblog/entry/48</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 30 Mar 2009 16:19:42 GMT</pubDate>
<title><![CDATA[ Video Advertising Rises 123% Year-On-Year ]]></title>
<link>http://www.spectrecom.co.uk/newsblog/entry/48</link>
<description><![CDATA[ <p>A <a href="http://www.techcrunch.com/2009/03/30/iab-reports-internet-advertising-grew-10-percent-last-year-outpacing-tv/" title="TechCrunch - IAB Reports Online Video Advertising Grows by 123%" target="_blank">report from the Interactive Advertising Bureau</a> posted on TechCrunch today reveals that online video advertising grew at a rampant pace in the last year, at a staggering 123%.</p>
<p><br />
<img width="629" height="326" src="images/website/iab-ad-formats.png" alt="" title="" /></p>
<p>  It was the fastest growing sub-category in all web-based advertising, easily outstripping search engine optimisation's 20% increase in the same time period.</p>
<p>It's a rosy report, showing that overall, web advertising in the US grew by more than 10 per cent.</p>
<p><a href="mailto:matt@spectrecom.co.uk?subject=Re:%20Video%20Advertising%20Rises%20123%%20Year-On-Year" title="email me about this story">matt@spectrecom.co.uk</a><br />
</p> ]]></description>
</item>
<item>
<guid>http://www.spectrecom.co.uk/newsblog/entry/46</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 26 Mar 2009 15:08:41 GMT</pubDate>
<title><![CDATA[ Web Video Can Lead to 40% Increased Buying ]]></title>
<link>http://www.spectrecom.co.uk/newsblog/entry/46</link>
<description><![CDATA[ <embed width="640" height="360" src="http://blip.tv/play/goRr9bUM1Ek%2Em4v" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowscriptaccess="always" allowfullscreen="true"></embed>
<p> </p>
<p>Here's a great video of comScore Chairman Gian Fulgoni saying that in studying some 2 million individuals, his organisation has detected that exposure to online video advertising can lead to a <span style="font-weight: bold; font-style: italic">40% increase in buying a product or service</span>.&nbsp;</p>
<p>Find this story and more on the rapid emergence of online video and its impact on industry and society at the <a href="http://www.beet.tv/2009/03/believe-it-comscore-chairman-tells-beettv-online-video-ads-provide-huge-lift-of-40-percent-in-increa.html" title="Beet.TV" target="_blank">Beet.TV website</a>.</p> ]]></description>
</item>
<item>
<guid>http://www.spectrecom.co.uk/newsblog/entry/45</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 25 Mar 2009 14:08:02 GMT</pubDate>
<title><![CDATA[ Image of the Day ]]></title>
<link>http://www.spectrecom.co.uk/newsblog/entry/45</link>
<description><![CDATA[ <p><img width="585" height="390" title="" alt="" src="images/website/1-5104.jpg" /></p>
<p>Consolidating some old files into handsome new folder hierarchies, and came across this image of <a title="Andrew Greener" href="/about-spectrecom/our-team/15">Andrew</a> and <a title="Sarah Aynesworth" href="/about-spectrecom/our-team/17">Sarah</a> (next to camera) filming an interview with Lord Sebastian Coe, as Chairman of the London Organising Committee for the Olympic Games.&nbsp; It was done for a project with Sunderland University, and this photo appeared in a Guardian photoessay featuring Mr. Coe.</p> ]]></description>
</item>
<item>
<guid>http://www.spectrecom.co.uk/newsblog/entry/44</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 24 Mar 2009 17:56:52 GMT</pubDate>
<title><![CDATA[ Analytics Weirdness ]]></title>
<link>http://www.spectrecom.co.uk/newsblog/entry/44</link>
<description><![CDATA[ <p>Just a little post to show the most bizarre string of keywords someone has found our site from...</p>
<p><img width="640" height="47" title="" alt="" src="/images/website/americansbelieve.jpg" /></p> ]]></description>
</item>
<item>
<guid>http://www.spectrecom.co.uk/newsblog/entry/43</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 20 Mar 2009 12:59:46 GMT</pubDate>
<title><![CDATA[ UK Video Traffic Up by 40% ]]></title>
<link>http://www.spectrecom.co.uk/newsblog/entry/43</link>
<description><![CDATA[ <p><span style="font-weight: bold; font-style: italic">An end-of-week post from Spectrecom HQ</span> -- Hitwise, the online measurement service, <a href="http://weblogs.hitwise.com/robin-goad/2009/03/online_video_traffic_up_41_bbc.html" title="Hitwise - UK Video Traffic Up by 40%" target="_blank">revealed today</a> that UK traffic to video websites increased by over 40% over the last 12 months.<br />
<br />
  In February of this year alone, 1 in every 35 internet visits in the UK went to a specialist video website - up from 1 in 50 the year before.<br />
<br />
  YouTube stakes its claim at the top of the chart, with 62.9% share of video sites (and is also the sixth moth visited website overall), with the BBC's iPlayer service following in second with a comparably fractional - yet still significant - portion of the total internet video audience at 11.2% (which is actually a 150% increase in its viewing figures the year before!).<br />
<br />
  Director of Research for Hitwise, Robin Goad, had this to say:&nbsp; &quot;Video is now a key component of the online landscape in the UK.&nbsp; Three years ago, YouTube was still in its infancy and slow connections meant that online video wasn't a viable option for many Internet users.&nbsp; Since then, UK internet traffic has increased 37-fold, and a growing number of sites now include video content.&quot;<br />
<br />
<span style="font-weight: bold; font-style: italic">&quot;Our research highlights the growth in video-specific websites, but if you were to add in all of the other sites that now include video - from newspapers to retailers - the numbers would be even higher.&quot;</span></p>
<p><a href="mailto:matt@spectrecom.co.uk?subject=Re:%20blog%20entry">matt@spectrecom.co.uk</a><br />
</p> ]]></description>
</item>
<item>
<guid>http://www.spectrecom.co.uk/newsblog/entry/42</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 20 Mar 2009 09:42:11 GMT</pubDate>
<title><![CDATA[ An Eye Online ]]></title>
<link>http://www.spectrecom.co.uk/newsblog/entry/42</link>
<description><![CDATA[ <p>I think Friday is quite a suitable day for this type of post, because it's typically the day where employees tend to take their foot off the throttle a bit and start looking forward to the weekend. So here's the second entry in what will hopefully be a regular feature on Spectrecom.co.uk - &quot;An Eye Online&quot;. As before, the only parameter that I've ticked is that the videos are Movie or TV related, or indeed are a very clever use of film/effects. Enjoy!</p>
<p><span style="text-decoration: underline; font-weight: bold">Star Wars vs. Rush Hour</span> <br />
      Movie Mashups are becoming quite a big thing on YouTube, and this is one of the funniest I've seen. The idea is essentially that two very different films are blended together, by using the visuals of one, and the audio of another.</p>
<object width="425" height="344">
<param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/vXNO4AIDFRE&amp;hl=en&amp;fs=1" />
<param name="allowFullScreen" value="true" />
<param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always" /></object>
<p>
<object width="425" height="344">
<embed width="425" height="344" src="http://www.youtube.com/v/vXNO4AIDFRE&amp;hl=en&amp;fs=1" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowscriptaccess="always" allowfullscreen="true"></embed></object><span style="font-weight: bold; text-decoration: underline"></span></p>
<p><span style="font-weight: bold; text-decoration: underline"><br />
</span></p>
<p><span style="font-weight: bold; text-decoration: underline">Watchmen as a Saturday morning cartoon<br />
</span>I think many of us can relate to the great Saturday morning cartoons of the 80's, and this video shows very cleverly what we might have had, if Watchmen had appeared in this format.</p>
<object width="425" height="344">
<param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/YDDHHrt6l4w&amp;hl=en&amp;fs=1" />
<param name="allowFullScreen" value="true" />
<param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always" />
<embed width="425" height="344" src="http://www.youtube.com/v/YDDHHrt6l4w&amp;hl=en&amp;fs=1" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowscriptaccess="always" allowfullscreen="true"></embed></object>
<p><span style="font-weight: bold; text-decoration: underline">Windertech E10<br />
</span>I loved this video from the Funny Or Die crew.<br />
<object width="470" height="300" classid="clsid:d27cdb6e-ae6d-11cf-96b8-444553540000">
<param name="movie" value="http://player.ordienetworks.com/flash/fodplayer.swf" />
<param name="flashvars" value="key=b5430c7a66" />
<param name="allowfullscreen" value="true" />
<embed width="470" height="300" flashvars="key=b5430c7a66" allowfullscreen="true" quality="high" src="http://player.ordienetworks.com/flash/fodplayer.swf" type="application/x-shockwave-flash"></embed></object></p>
<div style="text-align: center; width: 470px"><a href="http://www.funnyordie.com/videos/b5430c7a66/windertech-from-eric-drysdale" title="from Eric Drysdale">Windertech</a> - watch more <a href="http://www.funnyordie.com/" title="on Funny or Die">funny videos</a></div><br />
            
<p><span style="font-weight: bold; text-decoration: underline">VCR Hack<br />
</span>Another VHS related viral, but equally as funny.</p>
<object width="480" height="295">
<param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/MGx-3t8CJ-k&amp;hl=en&amp;fs=1" />
<param name="allowFullScreen" value="true" />
<param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always" />
<embed width="480" height="295" src="http://www.youtube.com/v/MGx-3t8CJ-k&amp;hl=en&amp;fs=1" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowscriptaccess="always" allowfullscreen="true"></embed></object>
<p><span style="font-weight: bold; text-decoration: underline"> <br />
</span></p>
<p><span style="font-weight: bold; text-decoration: underline">Ricky Gervais Meets Elmo</span><br />
                Out of all the videos posted today, I'd say this is my favourite.</p>     &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; <br />
<object width="425" height="344">
<param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/Kr9_5uZn6ds&amp;hl=en&amp;fs=1" />
<param name="allowFullScreen" value="true" />
<param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always" />
<embed width="425" height="344" src="http://www.youtube.com/v/Kr9_5uZn6ds&amp;hl=en&amp;fs=1" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowscriptaccess="always" allowfullscreen="true"></embed></object><br /> ]]></description>
</item>
<item>
<guid>http://www.spectrecom.co.uk/newsblog/entry/40</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 18 Mar 2009 10:27:17 GMT</pubDate>
<title><![CDATA[ UK Video Up by 10% ]]></title>
<link>http://www.spectrecom.co.uk/newsblog/entry/40</link>
<description><![CDATA[ <p>With economic doom and gloom being preached far and wide, it's encouraging to see a report from comScore, which reports a 10% increase in the UK's online video audience over the last year, representing a full 29.6 million unique UK viewers aged 15 and older.</p>
<p><img width="400" height="246" title="" alt="" src="/images/website/comscore-uk-video.jpg" /><br />
<br />
       Impressive to be sure - especially when put into context, this accounts for a <span style="font-style: italic; font-weight: bold">full 80.1% of the total UK internet audience</span> - but the UK has always lagged slightly behind developments in America, where everyone from <a target="_blank" title="Seriously, watch this!" href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5qbYNpnWBOE">used-car dealerships</a> in the mid-West to <a target="_blank" title="Dentists use Web Video Marketing" href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lvj_qPfKckM">dentists</a> on the West Coast have been using web video to market their small and medium sized businesses online.<br />
<br />
       YouTube, the iPlayer and a myriad of other video destinations have driven much of this growth, to be sure, but as the format's popularity rages on and acclimatises Joe Bloggs to an internet full of moving pictures, what will the effect on your site be?&nbsp; Will you be lost in the ether of non-dynamic websites?<br />
</p>
<p>The truth is, since we've shed our old, static website like crackled snakeskin, we've seen a staggering surge in all sorts of metrics.&nbsp; The average timespend by all users on our site over the past two months has been in excess of 6 minutes (up from about 2:30)!&nbsp; No doubt, it is largely down to the prominent video content we have on nearly every page across the site, averaging about 2 minutes each.&nbsp; </p>
<p>What's great about this is it means eyeballs are not only watching our videos, they're paying more attention to the rest of the page - much like the increased awareness one has of the adverts on a cramped Northern line train at rushhour.&nbsp;</p>
<p>And frankly, we like to think our videos are a better prospect than being sandwiched between post-workout, sweaty City workers and a horde of French primary school students!</p>
<p><a title="go on, email me - I dares ya." href="mailto:matt@spectrecom.co.uk?subject=Re:%20blog%20entry">matt@spectrecom.co.uk</a><br />
</p> ]]></description>
</item>
<item>
<guid>http://www.spectrecom.co.uk/newsblog/entry/38</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 10 Mar 2009 13:03:09 GMT</pubDate>
<title><![CDATA[ Opening the Film ]]></title>
<link>http://www.spectrecom.co.uk/newsblog/entry/38</link>
<description><![CDATA[ <p>Though a good opening titles sequence doesn't equal a good film (or TV series), the really best examples are unforgettable and can elevate even the most standard fare. Those who have seen <a href="http://justpressplay.net/movies/movie-news/4969-qwatchmenq-opening-credits-online.html" target="_blank">Watchmen</a> this weekend will probably recall the Bob Dylan accompanied opening credits because of it's great use of simple 3D text (with moving masks) and beautiful slow-mo footage. It's a sequence that allows the previous history of the film to be covered in just over 6 minutes, without the need for voiceover or dialogue, and is really effective in its use of mise en scène.<br />
<br />
  Saul Bass and Iginio Lardani are two of the more famous title creators from past cinema, and companies like <a href="http://www.yuco.com/">yU+co,</a> <a href="http://www.shinestudio.com/" target="_blank">Shine</a> and Duck Studios continue to specialise in credit sequences whilst continually raising the benchmark. Work like theirs leaves a great first impression on the viewer, and is a great way of setting the tone (and scene), or putting the story in its place (by using on-screen indicators to brief the audience). You'll see some incredibly inventive styles of art too, as well as some really experimental stand-outs that you wouldn't perhaps see outside of a museum or an independent cinema. Opening title sequences usually encompasses animation (when the films themselves often aren't animated), full motion video, mixed media or 3D. Stand outs over time are <a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iGsP4N-dpvc&amp;feature=related" target="_blank">Raging Bull</a>, <a href="http://www.veoh.com/browse/videos/category/entertainment/watch/v6325930g4ZZMCN8" target="_blank">Fight Club</a>, <a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qmAiy2RpY-8" target="_blank">Psycho</a>, <a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SEZK7mJoPLY" target="_blank">Se7en</a>, <a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1qHDWdGPomw" target="_blank">Superman</a>, <a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wRHFcQgNFQ8" target="_blank">Star Wars</a>, as well as more recent films like <a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_bpP9sI72bM" target="_blank">Kiss Kiss Bang Bang</a>, <a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SYHw_h1YdkA" target="_blank">RocknRolla</a>, <a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lLPUmYiVgbw&amp;eurl=http://www.smashingmagazine.com/2008/12/19/30-unforgettable-movie-title-sequences/" target="_parent">Stranger than Fiction</a>, <a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gaLDyrun_Cc&amp;playnext_from=PL&amp;feature=PlayList&amp;p=9259D42B58A7DF7B&amp;playnext=1&amp;index=37" target="_blank">Catch me if You Can</a>, <a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9d0d6qgsvTw&amp;feature=related" target="_blank">Lord of War</a> and <a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lpjKZ31dOhk" target="_blank">Dawn of the Dead</a> (to name but a few).<br />
<br />
  With the constant improvements seen on US TV in particular, many series there are also following suit in terms of quality openings. There's a great play on the show theme in the <a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SBN-wXgkUSM" target="_blank">Dexter</a> credits (which is arguably overlong), as well as a really stylish pieces like that of <a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RJQHdZJDyNQ&amp;feature=related" target="_blank">Ghost Whisperer,</a> <a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1zlBBkKyM_g" target="_blank">United States of Tara</a> and <a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WcRr-Fb5xQo&amp;feature=related" target="_blank">Mad Men</a>. Shows like True Blood, <a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=B909njPoX7k" target="_blank">Deadwood</a> and <a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BMqLks7qnew" target="_blank">Carnivale</a> also use opening titles to really help set the tone for the programme ahead, potentially warning the viewer over the type of content they might be seeing. Even <a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qZGz1Ajg7QU&amp;feature=related" target="_blank">The Simpsons</a> has (finally) had an overhaul of it's well known titles!<br />
<br />
  I'm a fan of opening title sequences, as you can probably tell, and I'll be sure to post anything on here in the future, that I think readers might find interesting. In the meantime, please check out the links below for further reading and visual treats!<br />
  &nbsp;</p>
<p><span style="font-weight: bold">Further reading</span><br />
<a href="http://www.artofthetitle.com/" target="_blank">http://www.artofthetitle.com/</a><br />
<a href="http://mmbase.submarinechannel.com/titlesequences/index.jsp%20" target="_blank">http://mmbase.submarinechannel.com/titlesequences/index.jsp</a> <br />
</p> ]]></description>
</item>
<item>
<guid>http://www.spectrecom.co.uk/newsblog/entry/35</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 27 Feb 2009 12:12:22 GMT</pubDate>
<title><![CDATA[ Over Half of Web Video Viewers are 35+ ]]></title>
<link>http://www.spectrecom.co.uk/newsblog/entry/35</link>
<description><![CDATA[ <p>Nielsen<a href="http://www.nielsen.com" title="The Nielsen Company Official Website" target="_blank"> </a>- the global market research company - recently revealed that over half the audience for internet video is age 35 or older, with the 45-54 age group accounting for more viewers than any other.&nbsp; </p>
<p>Driven by the ever-growing YouTube and an explosion of professional video content from TV networks through sites like the BBC iPlayer and Hulu in the US, the older age groups makes up a majority of the more than 10 <span style="font-style: italic">billion </span>video views now registering every month.</p>
<p>Yet more proof that internet video is probably one of the few things expected to grow in the economic downturn.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.emarketer.com/Article.aspx?id=1006774" title="eMarketer - Video Demographics Report" target="_blank"><img width="324" height="278" border="0" src="/images/website/demofig.gif" alt="" title="" /></a></p>
<p><a href="mailto:matt@spectrecom.co.uk?subject=blog%20entry">matt@spectrecom.co.uk</a><br />
</p> ]]></description>
</item>
<item>
<guid>http://www.spectrecom.co.uk/newsblog/entry/33</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 16 Feb 2009 17:15:24 GMT</pubDate>
<title><![CDATA[ YouTube Goes Offline ]]></title>
<link>http://www.spectrecom.co.uk/newsblog/entry/33</link>
<description><![CDATA[ <p><a href="http://www.youtube.com/blog?entry=Mp1pWVLh3_Y" title="YouTube goes offline" target="_parent">YouTube have today announced</a> that they will trialling a service that allows visitors to download its video content in order to keep it and watch offline. Thai Tran from YouTube says:&quot;Many video creators on YouTube want their work to be seen far and wide. They don't mind sharing their work, provided that they get the proper credit. Using Creative Commons licenses, we're giving our partners and community more choices to make that happen. Creative Commons licenses permit people to reuse downloaded content under certain conditions.&quot;&nbsp;</p>
<p>&nbsp;In some cases there may be a fee (payable through Google Checkout) and it's worth mentioning that there are already a number of ways of (illegally) pulling YouTube videos from the website. But it's great to see a legitimate way is being offered now to viewers of the video content, even if the appeal is (arguably) limited. </p>
<p>&nbsp;<a href="mailto:ben@spectrecom.co.uk?subject=YouTube" title="YouTube">ben@spectrecom.co.uk</a></p> ]]></description>
</item>
<item>
<guid>http://www.spectrecom.co.uk/newsblog/entry/27</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 30 Jan 2009 12:46:47 GMT</pubDate>
<title><![CDATA[ Sky Going 3D?! ]]></title>
<link>http://www.spectrecom.co.uk/newsblog/entry/27</link>
<description><![CDATA[ <p>Following up on my previous 3D cinema article, it seems that Sky are getting in on the act: <a target="_blank" href="http://business.timesonline.co.uk/tol/business/industry_sectors/media/article5607801.ece">a service “could be launched any time in the next two years”</a></p>
<p>It seems incredibly optimistic, and 3D televisions need to be circulated in a major way within the next couple of years. Still, it's got me all excited, especially about the prospect of having a Premiership footballer virtually smashing a football into my living room on a weekly basis. <br />
</p>
<p><a title="3D Sky" href="mailto:ben@spectrecom.co.uk?subject=3D%20Sky">ben@spectrecom.co.uk</a><br />
</p> ]]></description>
</item>
<item>
<guid>http://www.spectrecom.co.uk/newsblog/entry/26</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 30 Jan 2009 09:27:43 GMT</pubDate>
<title><![CDATA[ An Eye Online ]]></title>
<link>http://www.spectrecom.co.uk/newsblog/entry/26</link>
<description><![CDATA[ <p>One of the great things about working at a production company, is that you can usually justify watching the odd video online during office hours, because it's obviously “research”. Okay so that's not strictly true, but there are times during the working day when we'll all group around a computer to watch a humorous viral that's landed in one of our inboxes, or when we see something so downright genius that we can help but send it around to each and every friend, or indeed to other filmmakers we work with. So with that chain of thought, it seemed like a good idea to try and collate some of the best things I've seen recently and post them here on a regular basis. The only parameter that I've ticked is that the videos are Movie or TV related, or indeed are a very clever use of film/effects. Enjoy!<br />
<span style="font-style: italic">This video seems too good to be true; the difficulty of pulling off such a stunt is immense. But from digging a little deeper it turns out that it's actually 100% real, and was put together and performed by Blinkenlights.net. Very clever indeed: </span><br />
<br />
<object width="425" height="344">
<param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/0L7DTMKekoU&amp;color1=0xb1b1b1&amp;color2=0xcfcfcf&amp;hl=en&amp;feature=player_embedded&amp;fs=1" />
<param name="allowFullScreen" value="true" />
<embed width="425" height="344" src="http://www.youtube.com/v/0L7DTMKekoU&amp;color1=0xb1b1b1&amp;color2=0xcfcfcf&amp;hl=en&amp;feature=player_embedded&amp;fs=1" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowfullscreen="true"></embed></object><span style="font-style: italic">Many people think they've seen Star Wars, but have they actually seen it? In this great video from Vimeo, the creator has recorded a female friend giving the low-down on the original trilogy, and has used the old (or Internet fave) 'cut and paste' style of graphics to recreate the story visually; great use of the Wilhelm scream too. See what you think:</span><br />
<br />
<object width="400" height="225">
<param value="true" name="allowfullscreen" />
<param value="always" name="allowscriptaccess" />
<param value="http://vimeo.com/moogaloop.swf?clip_id=2809991&amp;server=vimeo.com&amp;show_title=1&amp;show_byline=1&amp;show_portrait=0&amp;color=&amp;fullscreen=1" name="movie" />
<embed width="400" height="225" allowscriptaccess="always" allowfullscreen="true" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" src="http://vimeo.com/moogaloop.swf?clip_id=2809991&amp;server=vimeo.com&amp;show_title=1&amp;show_byline=1&amp;show_portrait=0&amp;color=&amp;fullscreen=1"></embed></object><br />
<a href="http://vimeo.com/">Star Wars: Retold (by someone who hasn't seen it)</a> from <a href="http://vimeo.com/user759504">Joe Nicolosi</a> on <a href="http://vimeo.com">Vimeo</a><br />
<br />
<span style="font-style: italic">We filmed some stuff in the studio a while back, in some down time, where Jonny was swinging around with a cleaning mop. Quite easily and effectively, we added a Lightsabre effect to the video in After Effects, and ended up with a really cool little video. We'll probably put it up here on the Blog soon, but in the meantime I found this remix of The Color of Money, where Tom Cruise wields a Lightsabre at the pool table instead of the a cue. He also does the same in <a href="http://uk.youtube.com/watch?v=T4nmtdyjaWg&amp;NR=1">The Last Samurai</a></span></p>
<object width="425" height="344">
<param value="http://www.youtube.com/v/39MuHjSerYQ&amp;color1=0xb1b1b1&amp;color2=0xcfcfcf&amp;hl=en&amp;feature=player_embedded&amp;fs=1" name="movie" />
<param value="true" name="allowFullScreen" />
<embed width="425" height="344" allowfullscreen="true" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" src="http://www.youtube.com/v/39MuHjSerYQ&amp;color1=0xb1b1b1&amp;color2=0xcfcfcf&amp;hl=en&amp;feature=player_embedded&amp;fs=1"></embed></object><br />
<br />
<p><span style="font-style: italic">I've just seen David Fincher's latest, The Curious Case of Benjamin Button, and although I enjoyed it immensely it seemed altogether very familiar:</span><br />
</p>
<object width="470" height="270" classid="clsid:d27cdb6e-ae6d-11cf-96b8-444553540000">
<param value="http://player.ordienetworks.com/flash/fodplayer.swf" name="movie" />
<param value="key=1d76506803" name="flashvars" />
<param value="true" name="allowfullscreen" />
<embed width="470" height="270" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" src="http://player.ordienetworks.com/flash/fodplayer.swf" quality="high" allowfullscreen="true" flashvars="key=1d76506803"></embed></object>
<div style="text-align: center; width: 470px"><a title="by FGump44" href="http://www.funnyordie.com/videos/1d76506803/the-curious-case-of-forrest-gump-from-fgump44">The Curious Case of Forrest Gump</a> - watch more <a title="on Funny or Die" href="http://www.funnyordie.com/">funny videos</a></div> ]]></description>
</item>
<item>
<guid>http://www.spectrecom.co.uk/newsblog/entry/24</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 28 Jan 2009 16:47:25 GMT</pubDate>
<title><![CDATA[ Best Editing? ]]></title>
<link>http://www.spectrecom.co.uk/newsblog/entry/24</link>
<description><![CDATA[ <p>You know when you’re watching the Oscar highlights, and they show the ‘Other winners’ section for the more uninteresting awards? In other words, anything that they would usually expect the audience to fast forward through, because we only care about the awards that involve the stars in the stalls. Well the ‘Academy Award for Film Editing’ typically falls into that category, and the nominations are in:<br />
<br />
</p>
<ul>
<li><span style="font-style: italic">The Curious Case of Benjamin Button</span> - Kirk Baxter and Angus Wall</li>
<li><span style="font-style: italic">The Dark Knight</span><a href="http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0468569/"> </a>- Lee Smith</li>
<li><span style="font-style: italic">Frost/Nixon</span> - Mike Hill and Dan Hanley</li>
<li><span style="font-style: italic">Milk</span> - Elliot Graham</li>
<li><span style="font-style: italic">Slumdog Millionaire</span> - Chris Dickens<br />
</li></ul>
<p>The Bourne Ultimatum won last year, and deservedly so. Quantum of Solace could only but try match it, and then failed to do so in what turned out to be more of a distraction than an attempt to serve the story. There’s nothing quite on par with that this year (‘Bourne’ had 37 cuts in the first minute), but it’s an interesting list.<br />
<br />
  Out of the nominees, I think any of the films could really pick up the award. Each were edited as well as you’d expect a major motion picture to be, and in the case of Frost/Nixon a potentially slow political (stage-play) drama was turned into a very exciting and intriguing story.&nbsp; However, I do expect this years most adored film – Slumdog Millionaire – to be the one that runs away with it. I’m sure Danny Boyle shot a lot of street footage, which would have meant that the editor was given a lot to work with. However I also know David Fincher shoots as many takes as necessary, in order to get the performance he wants for his film. That could mean that he knows what his favourite take is during shooting, or that the editor has many options in post-production. From previous reading on the (admittedly brilliant) Director, I imagine there’s an awful amount of micro managing during the entire process. ‘The Curious Case of Benjamin Button’ is a long film though, and as great as it is, could have arguably been trimmed a little to bring the running time down to something a little more manageable. I’m sure David Fincher has a lot to do with that though, so I wouldn’t want to hold it against the editor(s) too much! </p>
<p>Milk was a very interesting film, and clear awards bait, but it’s editing didn’t particularly resonate with me in a way that I felt it was deserving of an award. My personal favourite from the list is The Dark Knight. It's a a fantastic film, and probably the underdog in this competition. The action scenes really fizzed and the tension raised dramatically during key moments thanks to some great intercutting between the unfolding drama - particularly during the Dent/Dawes explosion scene. I’d be pleased to see this win, though I don’t see anything within the list being particularly undeserving (like when The Golden Compass won the ‘Best SFX’ Oscar over Transformers).&nbsp; <br />
<br style="font-weight: bold" />
</p>
<p><span style="font-weight: bold">Who I would like to win</span> – The Dark Knight<br />
<span style="font-weight: bold">Who will probably win</span> – Slumdog Millionaire</p>
<p><a href="mailto:ben@spectrecom.co.uk?subject=Editing%20Oscar%20Article" title="Editing Oscar Article">ben@spectrecom.co.uk</a><br />
</p> ]]></description>
</item>
<item>
<guid>http://www.spectrecom.co.uk/newsblog/entry/23</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 26 Jan 2009 17:09:26 GMT</pubDate>
<title><![CDATA[ All Cinema to go 3D? ]]></title>
<link>http://www.spectrecom.co.uk/newsblog/entry/23</link>
<description><![CDATA[ <p>I've been expecting 3D cinema to launch in a much wider scale for a good while now, and with Philips developing the technology for the home entertainment market it's evident that there is some expectancy that the format will eventually become the norm. George Lucas and Steven Spielberg have been outspoken about this method of presentation for a number of years, with Star Wars originally slated to be one of the first to take advantage of cutting edge 'true 3D' cinema. Even though that clearly didn't happen, the occasional 3D film like <a href="http://www.imdb.com/title/tt1179891/">&quot;My Bloody Valentine&quot;</a>, which is currently on general release, has kept the format very relevant: <br />
</p>
<object width="425" height="344">
<param value="http://www.youtube.com/v/bsRbqpiqkKU&amp;hl=en&amp;fs=1" name="movie" />
<param value="true" name="allowFullScreen" />
<param value="always" name="allowscriptaccess" />
<embed width="425" height="344" allowfullscreen="true" allowscriptaccess="always" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" src="http://www.youtube.com/v/bsRbqpiqkKU&amp;hl=en&amp;fs=1"></embed></object>
<p>&nbsp;<br />
     It all looks like great (albeit gory) fun, even though reviewers have said that there's no real reason to see this film outside of a 3D auditorium. You also have to wonder how successful it will be on the home video market. Indeed it's been a good while since a 3D horror hit the big screen (though I do recall trying to watch Friday the 13th: 3D at home), and it's undoubtedly going to bring in a massive audience, based on the clear novelty factor of people wanting to be in a cinema where they are able to dodge the flying blood and guts.   But if cinema is to pick up 3D and run with it, it needs to be done less as a gimmick and more so as a natural progression. People didn't think that the talkie &quot;The Jazz Singer&quot; would catch on, and then two years later silent movies were more or less dead. Though it's not a direct comparison it clearly shows that predicting what will and won't work on the big screen isn't necessarily a science. </p>
<p>That said, CEO of DreamWorks Animation, Jeffrey Katzenberg, mentioned in an article in <a href="http://www.guardian.co.uk/film/2009/jan/18/bolt-disney-animated-films">The Guardian</a>&nbsp;
<http:> last week that &quot;in five-to-seven years, all films will be made in 3D&quot;. With only 100 or so UK based 3D screens, and only 1000 in the US, it might seem a little optimistic but with the prospect of major movies like Pixar's 
<http: title=""> &quot;Up
<http: title="">&quot;,
<http: title=""> &quot;Toy Story 3&quot; and James Cameron's forthcoming </http:></http:></http:></http:>&quot;Avatar&quot; using 3D, it's surely only a matter of time that it's rolled out across a majority of screens. Cameron himself might just be the biggest player in the whole thing, as he is looking to use it less as a gimmick, but moreso as a way of storytelling. His movie is expected to do fantastic business, especially with elevated cinema ticket prices, and could just be a defining moment in the history of cinema.  But just how good is 3D cinema? </p>
<p>Well thankfully the day of dual colour lensed glasses is gone - at least outside of the home - and although you might look a little silly in the specs they give you, the effect is incredible. Having been to the IMAX and seen 3D films (like Beowulf), I have been wowed by the format. On my travels last year in Florida the technology was being used to great effect by Disney and Universal in their parks*. But again it was being used as a novelty, which is the primary reason that many think it will never catch on in cinema.   The biggest problem of all however, in the fight to get 3D into our lives wholesale, is one that is affecting us all at the moment.
<http:> The recession. Paramount themselves are trying to help matters, by paying for print fees, and indeed ticket sales this February for the aforementioned &quot;My Bloody Valentine&quot; could help persuade more studios to greenlight 3D flicks, but it's an interesting development and one that's clearly got legs. Lets just hope that whatever happens, it's for the benefit of cinema and us the moviegoers.
<http:></http:></http:></p>
<p><br />
   Further reading:<br />
<a href="http://www.reelzchannel.com/article.aspx?articleid=816%20%20" title="">http://www.reelzchannel.com/article.aspx?articleid=816</a> <br />
</p>
<p>*If you ever go, please check out the Spider-man 3D ride, with its virtual 400 foot freefall. Then collect your stomach afterwards.</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p><a href="mailto:ben@spectrecom.co.uk?subject=3D%20Cinema%20Article" title="Just wanted to say...">ben@spectrecom.co.uk </a><br />
</p> ]]></description>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>